Home

Advertisement

 
 
05 April 2008 @ 01:06 pm
WRISTWATCH  
Photobucket



(Sixties pop soundtrack for Wristwatches)

Kaleidoscope - Mr Small The Watch Repair Man

Blossom Toes - Mister Watchmaker

Paul Jones - High Time

(Two Skinny Johns, with wristwatches)

John Rotten
Photobucket

John Waters
Photobucket

(Anton LaVey)
Photobucket

I do not own a cell phone (no one worth calling) so I need a watch to tell me the time. Even though I am an anachronistic clown, I do not normally wear a pocket watch. I wear a wristwatch. My favorite watch is dead and I need a new one. I am looking for a skeleton watch - a watch that shows the inner gearworks. I may regret this decision, since gears/cogs/pulleys are in danger of being ruined by Steam Punks. If you haven't encountered Steam Punks, they are fat goths who wear pleather trench coats, goggles, and fake top hats. (Fake top hats are made from wool felt. A real top hat is made from silk or beaver. A wool felt top hat is only acceptable if your name is Wavy Gravy.)

In looking for a new skeleton watch, here's some personal preferences: Square is better than round. Two hands are better than three. A black dail is better than a white dial. A leather band is better than a metal band. A gold watch is better than silver. (Most of my cufflinks are gold, but not always, so a watch that is mostly gold, but has touches of silver, might be the most versatile.)

I've spent 20+ hours looking at watches, and I'm down to nine candidates:

Candidate #1
Photobucket

Candidate #2
Photobucket

Candidate #3
Photobucket

Candidate #4
Photobucket

Candidate #5
Photobucket

Candidate #6
Photobucket

Candidate #7
Photobucket

Candidate #8
Photobucket

Candidate #9
Photobucket

Most people I've consulted seem to prefer number 8. Myself, I'm leaning towards number 2 and number 7....

 
 
( Post a new comment )
Gregory[info]dandy_gregory on April 5th, 2008 08:20 pm (UTC)
#7 or #9...The other one's would be too difficult to read.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
meatmay[info]meatmay on April 5th, 2008 08:58 pm (UTC)
8#
8!!!!!! is the only way to go.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
jermynsavile[info]jermynsavile on April 5th, 2008 09:45 pm (UTC)
#2 or #8. But these would be safer from Steam Punks.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
Arthur H. Ward (a pseudonym)[info]horsdumonde on April 6th, 2008 01:01 am (UTC)
The "cages" are very odd...where did that style come from? Were these watches for rugby players?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
jermynsavile[info]jermynsavile on April 6th, 2008 01:05 am (UTC)
They're WWI trench watches, designed for servicemen. I've seen some wonderful examples over the years. What I like about them is that they date before the time when styles were fixed. I keep meaning to buy one, but usually the examples I see have very dainty straps that don't really look good on the wrist - I suppose that it is the change of tastes over the years. Watches seem to get chunkier and chunkier as each year goes on!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
thedandiest[info]thedandiest on April 6th, 2008 04:51 am (UTC)
I like them. Very Billy Childish.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
lord_whimsy[info]lord_whimsy on April 7th, 2008 03:52 am (UTC)
Mighty fine, those.

Don't own a watch. They never last very long on my arm.

Here are some I like:

1
2
3
4

The last one would get the goggles at BrassCon steamed up!

Edited at 2008-04-07 03:54 am (UTC)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
O: Rabbits[info]bibermx on April 8th, 2008 04:04 am (UTC)
Oh,number one is,how to put it, Kubrick meets Star Trek meets Tarkovsky meets....
Delightful.

O.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
O: Nanny & I[info]bibermx on April 8th, 2008 04:06 am (UTC)
These are fascinating...never seen them before...the first one in particular I truly covet...

O.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
O: Nanny & I[info]bibermx on April 6th, 2008 12:21 am (UTC)
Number 8 and number 9,I think.

O.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
Arthur H. Ward (a pseudonym)[info]horsdumonde on April 6th, 2008 12:58 am (UTC)
I might for myself choose #1, but #7 suits you the most, I think.
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
jermynsavile[info]jermynsavile on April 6th, 2008 01:06 am (UTC)
#1 is good. I missed that.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
William[info]sirwilliam on April 6th, 2008 02:39 am (UTC)


This is the gold version of my watch (mine is stainless). A mechanical Mont Blanc Reserve de Marche

Edited at 2008-04-06 04:19 am (UTC)
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
thedandiest[info]thedandiest on April 6th, 2008 04:59 am (UTC)
Very nice. You're a man with good taste, W.
I've been apprehensive about going with a manual winding watch, instead of an automatic winding watch-- not sure I have the necessary discipline for it!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
J.Y.[info]dic_tator on April 6th, 2008 07:11 am (UTC)
A rather costly option:

1
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
thedandiest[info]thedandiest on April 6th, 2008 09:27 pm (UTC)
Total greatness - it's timepiece porn. Who is the maker?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Link)
I Wanna Be Your Girlfriend[info]riffrandell on April 15th, 2008 02:28 am (UTC)
My old Elgin ceased to function around the most convenient hour, and now it's always time for chocolate!

After Eight
(Reply) (Thread) (Link)
 

Advertisement